A clear explanation of computing the clumsy factorial by simulating cyclic operators with a stack.
Problem Restatement
The clumsy factorial of a positive integer n is defined as follows:
Start from n and apply operators *, /, +, - in a fixed cyclic order, descending through integers.
For example, clumsy(10) = 10 * 9 / 8 + 7 - 6 * 5 / 4 + 3 - 2 * 1.
Division is integer division truncated toward zero.
We need to return the clumsy factorial of n.
The official constraints state that 1 <= n <= 10000.
Input and Output
| Item | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Input | Integer n |
| Output | Clumsy factorial of n |
| Operators | Cycle through *, /, +, - |
| Division | Truncated integer division |
Function shape:
def clumsy(n: int) -> int:
...Examples
Example 1:
n = 44 * 3 / 2 + 1 = 7Answer:
7Example 2:
n = 1010 * 9 / 8 + 7 - 6 * 5 / 4 + 3 - 2 * 1
= 11 + 7 - 7 + 3 - 2
= 12Answer:
12Key Insight
Operator precedence matters: * and / bind tighter than + and -.
We can use a stack to handle this. Push numbers and compute * and / immediately. Then push the result. For +, push the next number. For -, push the negation of the next group.
This ensures that * and / are evaluated before + and -.
Algorithm
- Use a stack. Push
n. - Track the current operator (start with
*for the second number). - For each subsequent number
ifromn-1down to1:- Apply the current operator to
stack[-1]andi, or push the new number. - For
*:stack[-1] *= i - For
/:stack[-1] = int(stack[-1] / i)(truncate toward zero) - For
+:stack.append(i) - For
-:stack.append(-i) - Cycle to the next operator.
- Apply the current operator to
- Return
sum(stack).
Correctness
By applying * and / directly to the top of the stack, we respect their higher precedence.
By pushing the result of + (positive) and - (negative) as separate entries, we correctly handle their lower precedence.
The final sum of the stack gives the correct result with all precedences respected.
Edge Cases
- The stack should store exactly the unresolved items needed by the invariant.
- Process equal values deliberately; many monotonic-stack problems differ only in
<versus<=. - Flush or inspect the remaining stack after the scan if unresolved items still contribute to the answer.
Complexity
| Metric | Value | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Time | O(n) | Process each integer from n down to 1 |
| Space | O(n) | Stack can hold at most n/4 entries |
Common Pitfalls
- Do not optimize away the invariant; the code should still make it clear what condition is being maintained.
- Prefer problem-specific names over one-letter variables once the logic becomes stateful.
Implementation
import math
class Solution:
def clumsy(self, n: int) -> int:
ops = ['*', '/', '+', '-']
stack = [n]
op_idx = 0
for i in range(n - 1, 0, -1):
op = ops[op_idx % 4]
op_idx += 1
if op == '*':
stack[-1] *= i
elif op == '/':
stack[-1] = math.trunc(stack[-1] / i)
elif op == '+':
stack.append(i)
else:
stack.append(-i)
return sum(stack)Code Explanation
Initialize the stack with n:
stack = [n]For each descending number, apply the current operator:
op = ops[op_idx % 4]
op_idx += 1* and / modify the top of the stack:
if op == '*':
stack[-1] *= i
elif op == '/':
stack[-1] = math.trunc(stack[-1] / i)+ and - push new entries:
elif op == '+':
stack.append(i)
else:
stack.append(-i)We use math.trunc to ensure truncation toward zero for negative divisions.
Return the total sum:
return sum(stack)Testing
def run_tests():
s = Solution()
assert s.clumsy(4) == 7
assert s.clumsy(10) == 12
assert s.clumsy(1) == 1
assert s.clumsy(2) == 2
assert s.clumsy(3) == 6
print("all tests passed")
run_tests()| Test | Expected | Why |
|---|---|---|
4 | 7 | 4*3/2+1 = 7 |
10 | 12 | Full example |
1 | 1 | Single number |
2 | 2 | 2*1 = 2 |
3 | 6 | 3*2/1 = 6 |