Math 2.0

Category theory; homological algebra Definition

Cartan–Eilenberg resolution

Builds on Abelian categoryChain complexDouble complexProjective objectProjective resolutionHomology of a chain complexChain map

Definition

Let 𝒜\mathcal{A} be an abelian category and let C∙C_\bullet be a chain complex in 𝒜\mathcal{A}. A Cartan–Eilenberg resolution of C∙C_\bullet is a double complex P∙,∙P_{\bullet,\bullet} of projective objects with Pp,q=0P_{p,q} = 0 for q<0q < 0. Its horizontal differential is dh ⁣:Pp,q→Pp−1,qd^h \colon P_{p,q} \to P_{p-1,q} and its vertical differential is dv ⁣:Pp,q→Pp,q−1d^v \colon P_{p,q} \to P_{p,q-1}. It comes with a chain map ε ⁣:P∙,0→C∙\varepsilon \colon P_{\bullet,0} \to C_\bullet with ε∘dv=0\varepsilon \circ d^v = 0 on P∙,1P_{\bullet,1}. These data must satisfy, for every pp:

  1. if Cp=0C_p = 0, then Pp,q=0P_{p,q} = 0 for all qq;
  2. the maps induced by ε\varepsilon on boundaries, Bp(P∙,∙,dh)→Bp(C)B_p(P_{\bullet,\bullet}, d^h) \to B_p(C), form a projective resolution of Bp(C)B_p(C);
  3. the maps induced by ε\varepsilon on homology, Hp(P∙,∙,dh)→Hp(C)H_p(P_{\bullet,\bullet}, d^h) \to H_p(C), form a projective resolution of Hp(C)H_p(C).

Here Bp(P∙,∙,dh)B_p(P_{\bullet,\bullet}, d^h) and Hp(P∙,∙,dh)H_p(P_{\bullet,\bullet}, d^h) are the complexes, with vertical differential, of horizontal boundaries and horizontal homology in column pp.

Remarks

It follows that each column Pp,∙→CpP_{p,\bullet} \to C_p and the cycles Zp(P∙,∙,dh)→Zp(C)Z_p(P_{\bullet,\bullet}, d^h) \to Z_p(C) are projective resolutions too. If 𝒜\mathcal{A} has enough projectives, every chain complex has a Cartan–Eilenberg resolution. It is built with the horseshoe lemma applied to 0→Bp→Zp→Hp→00 \to B_p \to Z_p \to H_p \to 0 and 0→Zp→Cp→Bp−1→00 \to Z_p \to C_p \to B_{p-1} \to 0. Example: let CC be a module MM in degree 00, and place a projective resolution Q∙→MQ_\bullet \to M in column 00. This is a Cartan–Eilenberg resolution: the boundaries are 00, resolved by 00. The horizontal homology of column 00 is Q∙Q_\bullet, which resolves H0(C)=MH_0(C) = M. Non-example: over ℤ\Z, let CC be ℤ→⋅2ℤ\Z \xrightarrow{\cdot 2} \Z in degrees 11 and 00, and let P=CP = C placed in row 00. Clause 3 fails in degree 00: the horizontal homology there is ℤ/2ℤ\Z/2\Z alone. It is not projective, so it is not a projective resolution of H0(C)=ℤ/2ℤH_0(C) = \Z/2\Z. Injective Cartan–Eilenberg resolutions of cochain complexes are defined dually.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 8 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Abelian category concept
  2. Chain complex concept
  3. Chain map concept
  4. Double complex concept
  5. Homology of a chain complex concept
  6. Projective object concept
  7. Projective resolution concept
  8. Cartan–Eilenberg resolution definition

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cartan%E2%80%93Eilenberg_resolution
About this page
TagP84GBDM0QR
URIm2://P84GBDM0QR
Kinddefinition
WritingW0 stub
MSC18G10, 18G35
DefinesCartan–Eilenberg resolution
UsesAbelian category, Chain complex, Double complex, Projective object, Projective resolution, Homology of a chain complex, Chain map

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.