Math 2.0

Category theory; homological algebra Definition

Fibration and cofibration

Builds on Model categoryWeak equivalenceLifting propertySerre fibrationHurewicz fibrationCofibration

Definition

Let ℳ\mathcal{M} be a model category with weak equivalences WW. A fibration is a morphism in the class Fib\mathrm{Fib} of the model structure, and a cofibration is a morphism in the class Cof\mathrm{Cof}. A trivial (or acyclic) fibration is a fibration that is also in WW, and a trivial cofibration is a cofibration that is also in WW. An object XX is fibrant if the morphism X→∗X \to \ast to the terminal object is a fibration. It is cofibrant if the morphism ∅→X\emptyset \to X from the initial object is a cofibration.

Remarks

The axioms of a model category imply characterizations by the lifting property. A morphism is a cofibration if and only if it has the left lifting property with respect to all trivial fibrations. A morphism is a fibration if and only if it has the right lifting property with respect to all trivial cofibrations. Dually, the trivial cofibrations are the maps with the left lifting property with respect to fibrations. The trivial fibrations are the maps with the right lifting property with respect to cofibrations. So, given WW, the fibrations determine the cofibrations and conversely.

Example: in the Quillen model structure on topological spaces, the fibrations are the Serre fibrations, and every space is fibrant. In the Strøm model structure on topological spaces, the fibrations are the Hurewicz fibrations and the cofibrations are the closed cofibrations in the sense of the homotopy extension property. In the projective model structure on non-negatively graded chain complexes of modules over a ring, the fibrations are the maps that are surjective in each positive degree.

Non-example: in the Quillen model structure, the inclusion p ⁣:{0}→[0,1]p \colon \set{0} \to [0, 1] is not a fibration. The path t↦tt \mapsto t in [0,1][0, 1] starts at the image 00 of pp, but it has no lift to {0}\set{0}, because it leaves the image of pp. So pp fails the right lifting property against the trivial cofibration {0}→[0,1]\set{0} \to [0, 1].

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 7 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Cofibration concept
  2. Hurewicz fibration concept
  3. Lifting property concept
  4. Model category concept
  5. Serre fibration concept
  6. Weak equivalence concept
  7. Fibration and cofibration definition

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model_category, Definition
About this page
Tag5ZA2T4C3N2
URIm2://5ZA2T4C3N2
Kinddefinition
WritingW0 stub
MSC18N40, 55U35
DefinesFibration and cofibration
UsesModel category, Weak equivalence, Lifting property, Serre fibration, Hurewicz fibration, Cofibration

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.