Math 2.0

Category theory; homological algebra Definition

Fusion category

Builds on Monoidal categoryRigid monoidal categoryAbelian categoryFieldGroup representation

Definition

Let kk be a field. A fusion category over kk is a monoidal category (π’ž,βŠ—,I)(\mathcal{C}, \otimes, I) such that:

  1. π’ž\mathcal{C} is kk-linear: every Hom⁑(A,B)\Hom(A, B) is a kk-vector space, composition is kk-bilinear, and βŠ—\otimes is kk-bilinear on morphisms;
  2. every Hom⁑(A,B)\Hom(A, B) is finite-dimensional;
  3. π’ž\mathcal{C} is semisimple: it is an abelian category in which every object is a finite direct sum of simple objects;
  4. π’ž\mathcal{C} has only finitely many isomorphism classes of simple objects;
  5. π’ž\mathcal{C} is rigid;
  6. the unit object II is simple.

Here an object is simple if it is nonzero and has no subobjects other than 00 and itself. Many authors assume that kk is algebraically closed.

Remarks

Example: for a finite group GG, the category Rep(G)\mathrm{Rep}(G) of finite-dimensional complex representations of GG is a fusion category over β„‚\C. It is semisimple by Maschke's theorem, has finitely many irreducible representations up to isomorphism, the dual of a representation gives rigidity, and the trivial representation is simple. Non-example: the category of finite-dimensional complex representations of the group β„€\Z satisfies clauses 1, 2, 5 and 6. It is not semisimple, and it has infinitely many simple objects, one for each Ξ»βˆˆβ„‚Γ—\lambda \in \C^\times. Non-example: for a field kk of characteristic pp and a group GG of order divisible by pp, Repk(G)\mathrm{Rep}_k(G) fails clause 3 by the failure of Maschke's theorem. If X1,…,XnX_1, \ldots, X_n are the simple objects, the fusion rules are the integers NijmN_{ij}^m with XiβŠ—Xj≅⨁mNijmXmX_i \otimes X_j \cong \bigoplus_m N_{ij}^m X_m.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 6 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Abelian category concept
  2. Field concept
  3. Group representation concept
  4. Monoidal category concept
  5. Rigid monoidal category concept
  6. Fusion category definition

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusion_category
About this page
Tag8FEGZWG3JH
URIm2://8FEGZWG3JH
Kinddefinition
WritingW0 stub
MSC18M20, 18M10
DefinesFusion category
UsesMonoidal category, Rigid monoidal category, Abelian category, Field, Group representation

Markdown Β· JSON Β· Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.