Difference and functional equations Definition
Hyers–Ulam stability
Builds on Metric spaceFunctional equation
Definition
Let be a nonempty set, let , and let be a metric space. Let be a set of maps , and let assign to each a map . Consider the functional equation for all . The equation is Hyers–Ulam stable in if there is a constant such that the following holds for every . If satisfies for all , then there is a solution of the equation with for all .
Remarks
Example: the Cauchy equation for maps from a normed space to a Banach space is Hyers–Ulam stable with ; here , and . Non-example: the periodicity equation for maps is not stable. For the map satisfies . If is -periodic, then for every integer , so is unbounded and no works. Some authors use a weaker form: for every there is such that a -approximate solution lies within of a solution. In the Hyers–Ulam–Rassias form, the constant bound is replaced by a control function such as .
Reading path
To understand this page from the ground up, read these 3 pages in order. The foundations come first.
Show the path as a graph
- no evidence level
- Functional equation concept
- Metric space concept
- Hyers–Ulam stability definition
Further reading
About this page
| Tag | GSVBM4F91E |
|---|---|
| URI | m2://GSVBM4F91E |
| Kind | definition |
| Writing | W0 stub |
| MSC | 39B82 |
| Defines | Hyers–Ulam stability |
| Uses | Metric space, Functional equation |
Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub
What this page needs for W1
- an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
- a source with a locator (0 of 1)
The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.
What links here
No page links to this page yet.