Calculus of variations and optimal control; optimization Direct methods and existence of minimizers Counterexample
Weierstrass's counterexample to the Dirichlet principle
Builds on Calculus of variationsIntegral functional with a Lagrangian densityDirect method in the calculus of variations
Counterexample
Consider the integral functional on the set of functions with and . Then , but no has , so has no minimiser on .
Check that the infimum is . For , put , which lies in . With , one has . Since , which tends to as , because .
Check that is not attained. If , then for all , by continuity of the integrand. So for , hence also at , and is constant. This contradicts .
Remarks
Riemann had used the Dirichlet principle, the claim that a nonnegative energy with given boundary values attains its infimum. Weierstrass's example shows that this claim can fail, even for a nonnegative functional with a smooth integrand. The minimising functions tend to the sign function, which jumps at and does not belong to the admissible class. The integrand is convex in , but its coefficient vanishes at . So gives no bound on near , and minimising sequences can develop a jump there. This is the failure of the compactness step of the direct method. Hilbert later justified the Dirichlet principle for the Dirichlet energy by the direct method.
Reading path
To understand this page from the ground up, read these 4 pages in order. The foundations come first.
Show the path as a graph
- no evidence level
- Calculus of variations concept
- Direct method in the calculus of variations concept
- Integral functional with a Lagrangian density concept
- Weierstrass's counterexample to the Dirichlet principle counterexample
Further reading
About this page
| Tag | 4KXHGXZQY8 |
|---|---|
| URI | m2://4KXHGXZQY8 |
| Kind | counterexample |
| Writing | W0 stub |
| MSC | 49J05, 35A15 |
| Uses | Calculus of variations, Integral functional with a Lagrangian density, Direct method in the calculus of variations |
Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub
What this page needs for W1
- an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
- a source with a locator (0 of 1)
- edge refutes or not_instance_of out (0 of 1)
The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.
What links here
No page links to this page yet.