Math 2.0

Integral transforms, operational calculus Definition

Asymptotic expansion from poles of a Mellin transform

Builds on Mellin transformFundamental strip of a Mellin transformMellin inversion theoremMeromorphic functionPoleResidueAsymptotic expansion

Definition

Let f ⁣:(0,∞)→ℂf \colon (0, \infty) \to \C be a function whose Mellin transform f∗(s)=∫0∞f(x) xs−1 dxf^*(s) = \int_0^\infty f(x)\, x^{s-1}\, dx converges absolutely in a fundamental strip α<Re⁡s<β\alpha < \operatorname{Re} s < \beta. Let γ<α\gamma < \alpha, and assume that f∗f^* extends to a meromorphic function on the strip γ<Re⁡s<β\gamma < \operatorname{Re} s < \beta with finitely many poles ρ1,…,ρm\rho_1, \dots, \rho_m there. For each pole ρ\rho, write the principal part of f∗f^* at ρ\rho as ∑k=0Kcρ,k(s−ρ)k+1.\sum_{k=0}^{K} \frac{c_{\rho, k}}{(s - \rho)^{k+1}}. The pole expansion of ff at 00 is ∑j=1m∑kcρj,k (−1)kk! x−ρj(log⁡x)k,\sum_{j=1}^{m} \sum_{k} c_{\rho_j, k}\, \frac{(-1)^k}{k!}\, x^{-\rho_j} (\log x)^k, where the inner sum runs over 0≤k≤K0 \le k \le K for each pole. It is the sum of the residues of f∗(s) x−sf^*(s)\, x^{-s} at ρ1,…,ρm\rho_1, \dots, \rho_m. The expansion at ∞\infty is defined in the same way from the poles to the right of the strip, with the opposite sign.

Remarks

The justification is the converse mapping theorem. Assume moreover that f∗(s)=O(∣s∣−r)f^*(s) = O(\abs{s}^{-r}) for some r>1r > 1 as ∣Im⁡s∣→∞\abs{\operatorname{Im} s} \to \infty, uniformly in the closed strip γ≤Re⁡s≤c\gamma \le \operatorname{Re} s \le c for some cc with α<c<β\alpha < c < \beta. Then, as x→0+x \to 0^+, f(x)f(x) equals the sum above plus O(x−γ)O(x^{-\gamma}), so this sum is an asymptotic expansion of ff to that order. The proof writes ff by the Mellin inversion theorem as an integral over the line Re⁡s=c\operatorname{Re} s = c, moves the line to Re⁡s=γ\operatorname{Re} s = \gamma, and collects residues. The residue of x−s(s−ρ)−k−1x^{-s} (s - \rho)^{-k-1} at ρ\rho is x−ρ(−log⁡x)k/k!x^{-\rho} (-\log x)^k / k!, which gives the coefficients above.

Example: f(x)=e−xf(x) = e^{-x} has f∗(s)=Γ(s)f^*(s) = \Gamma(s) on Re⁡s>0\operatorname{Re} s > 0. The poles at s=−ns = -n are simple with residue (−1)n/n!(-1)^n / n!, and Γ\Gamma decays exponentially on vertical lines. So for every NN one gets e−x=∑n=0N(−1)nxn/n!+O(xN+1/2)e^{-x} = \sum_{n=0}^{N} (-1)^n x^n / n! + O(x^{N+1/2}) as x→0+x \to 0^+, as Taylor's formula confirms.

Non-example: f(x)=1f(x) = 1 for 0<x≤10 < x \le 1 and f(x)=0f(x) = 0 for x>1x > 1 has f∗(s)=1/sf^*(s) = 1/s on Re⁡s>0\operatorname{Re} s > 0. The pole at 00 gives the term 11, which is correct for x<1x < 1, but 1/s1/s decays only like ∣s∣−1\abs{s}^{-1}, so the decay hypothesis fails. The jump of ff at x=1x = 1 is what spoils the decay.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 12 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Asymptotic expansion concept
  2. Big O notation concept
  3. Integrable function concept
  4. Inverse Mellin transform concept
  5. Mellin convergence concept
  6. Mellin transform concept
  7. Meromorphic function concept
  8. Pole concept
  9. Residue concept
  10. Fundamental strip of a Mellin transform statement
  11. Mellin inversion theorem statement
  12. Asymptotic expansion from poles of a Mellin transform definition

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mellin_transform
About this page
TagZ61W394YFA
URIm2://Z61W394YFA
Kinddefinition
WritingW0 stub
MSC44A15, 30E15, 41A60
DefinesAsymptotic expansion from poles of a Mellin transform
UsesMellin transform, Fundamental strip of a Mellin transform, Mellin inversion theorem, Meromorphic function, Pole, Residue, Asymptotic expansion

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.