Converse of Wilson's theorem
Builds on Wilson's theoremPrime number
Statement
Let be an integer with . If , then is a prime number.
Remarks
With Wilson's theorem, this gives: an integer is prime if and only if . The proof: if with , then divides . A congruence would give , which is false. In fact for each composite , and . This primality test is not practical, because needs about multiplications.
Reading path
To understand this page from the ground up, read these 5 pages in order. The foundations come first.
Show the path as a graph
- no evidence level
- Divisibility definition
- Congruence modulo n definition
- Prime number definition
- Wilson's theorem statement
- Converse of Wilson's theorem statement
Further reading
- Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilson%27s_theorem, Composite modulus
About this page
| Tag | 06WRV8HFDY |
|---|---|
| URI | m2://06WRV8HFDY |
| Kind | statement, proposition |
| Writing | W0 stub |
| MSC | 11A51 |
| Status | This copy of the site has no build data. Run m2 status 06WRV8HFDY. |
| Uses | Wilson's theorem, Prime number |
Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub
What this page needs for W1
- an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.
What links here
No page links to this page yet.