Math 2.0

Partial differential equations Equations of mathematical physics Theorem

Existence of Leray weak solutions

Builds on Navier–Stokes equationsWeak solutionSobolev space

Statement

Let ν>0\nu > 0 and let u0∈L2(ℝ3;ℝ3)u_0 \in L^2(\R^3; \R^3) satisfy ∇⋅u0=0\nabla \cdot u_0 = 0 in the sense of distributions. Then there exists a vector field u∈L∞(0,∞;L2(ℝ3;ℝ3))u \in L^\infty\big(0, \infty; L^2(\R^3; \R^3)\big) with ∇u∈L2(ℝ3×(0,∞))\nabla u \in L^2\big(\R^3 \times (0, \infty)\big) such that:

  1. uu is a weak solution of the Navier–Stokes equations with no external force and initial value u0u_0. That is, ∇⋅u(⋅,t)=0\nabla \cdot u(\cdot, t) = 0 for almost every tt. Also, let φ ⁣:ℝ3×[0,∞)→ℝ3\varphi \colon \R^3 \times [0, \infty) \to \R^3 be any smooth compactly supported test field with ∇⋅φ=0\nabla \cdot \varphi = 0. Then ∫0∞ ⁣ ⁣∫ℝ3(u⋅∂tφ+∑i,j=13uiuj ∂jφi−ν∇u:∇φ)dx dt+∫ℝ3u0⋅φ(x,0) dx=0.\int_0^\infty \!\! \int_{\R^3} \Big( u \cdot \partial_t \varphi + \sum_{i,j=1}^3 u_i u_j \, \partial_j \varphi_i - \nu \nabla u : \nabla \varphi \Big) dx \, dt + \int_{\R^3} u_0 \cdot \varphi(x, 0) \, dx = 0.
  2. uu satisfies the energy inequality: for every t>0t > 0, ∥u(⋅,t)∥L22+2ν∫0t∥∇u(⋅,s)∥L22 ds≤∥u0∥L22.\norm{u(\cdot, t)}_{L^2}^2 + 2 \nu \int_0^t \norm{\nabla u(\cdot, s)}_{L^2}^2 \, ds \le \norm{u_0}_{L^2}^2.

Here ∇u:∇φ=∑i,j∂jui ∂jφi\nabla u : \nabla \varphi = \sum_{i,j} \partial_j u_i \, \partial_j \varphi_i. A solution with these properties is called a Leray weak solution, or a Leray–Hopf weak solution.

Remarks

Jean Leray proved this theorem in 1934, and Eberhard Hopf later proved the analogue on bounded domains. The proof regularises the nonlinear term, solves the regularised problem, and uses the energy identity to bound the approximate solutions uniformly in the Sobolev space norm. A compactness argument then gives a subsequence whose limit solves the equations in the weak sense, and the energy inequality survives the limit by lower semicontinuity of the norm. The pressure does not appear, because ∫∇p⋅φ dx=0\int \nabla p \cdot \varphi \, dx = 0 for divergence-free φ\varphi. In two space dimensions the Leray weak solution is unique and smooth for positive times. In three dimensions its uniqueness and smoothness are open, and they are the heart of the Navier–Stokes existence and smoothness problem.

Going deeper

For a student

The theorem is the starting point of the mathematical theory of the Navier–Stokes equations. The energy inequality gives the only a priori bound that is known for large data, and the class of solutions it defines is the natural one for studying regularity. A weak solution that is smooth agrees with the classical solution, and a classical solution is unique among Leray weak solutions while it exists. Results such as the partial regularity theorem of Caffarelli, Kohn and Nirenberg concern this class of solutions. Buckmaster and Vicol showed that weak solutions without the energy inequality and with less regularity are not unique.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 4 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Navier–Stokes equations concept
  2. Sobolev space concept
  3. Weak solution concept
  4. Existence of Leray weak solutions statement

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navier–Stokes_existence_and_smoothness
About this page
TagDHHR5PZZ7E
URIm2://DHHR5PZZ7E
Kindstatement, theorem
WritingW0 stub
MSC35Q30, 76D05, 35D30
StatusThis copy of the site has no build data. Run m2 status DHHR5PZZ7E.
AboutNavier–Stokes equations, Weak solution
UsesNavier–Stokes equations, Weak solution, Sobolev space

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.