Math 2.0

Calculus of variations and optimal control; optimization Geometric measure theory and optimization on manifolds Theorem

Federer–Fleming compactness theorem

Builds on Integral currentFlat normCurrentArea-minimizing current

Statement

Let 0≤m≤n0 \le m \le n, let K⊆ℝnK \subseteq \R^n be compact, and let C>0C > 0. Let (Tj)j≥1(T_j)_{j \ge 1} be a sequence of integral currents of dimension mm on ℝn\R^n with support in KK. Assume 𝐌(Tj)+𝐌(∂Tj)≤C\mathbf{M}(T_j) + \mathbf{M}(\partial T_j) \le C for all jj, where 𝐌\mathbf{M} is the mass and ∂Tj=0\partial T_j = 0 when m=0m = 0. Then there are a subsequence (Tji)(T_{j_i}) and an integral mm-current TT with support in KK such that 𝐅(Tji−T)→0\mathbf{F}(T_{j_i} - T) \to 0, where 𝐅\mathbf{F} is the flat norm. Moreover 𝐌(T)≤lim inf⁡i𝐌(Tji)\mathbf{M}(T) \le \liminf_i \mathbf{M}(T_{j_i}) and 𝐌(∂T)≤lim inf⁡i𝐌(∂Tji)\mathbf{M}(\partial T) \le \liminf_i \mathbf{M}(\partial T_{j_i}).

Remarks

Weak convergence of a subsequence follows from the mass bound by a diagonal argument on a countable dense set of forms. The mass is lower semicontinuous under weak convergence, because it is a supremum of the continuous functionals T↦T(ω)T \mapsto T(\omega). The hard part is the closure statement: the weak limit is again integral, and the convergence holds in the flat norm. Federer and Fleming proved it with the deformation theorem, which pushes currents onto a cubical grid; later proofs use slicing.

Example at work: let BB be an integral (m−1)(m-1)-current with compact support that is the boundary of some integral mm-current. A minimising sequence for the mass among integral currents with boundary BB can be projected into a fixed ball without increasing mass, and its boundary masses are all 𝐌(B)\mathbf{M}(B). The theorem gives a limit with boundary BB and least mass, an area-minimizing current.

The bound on 𝐌(∂Tj)\mathbf{M}(\partial T_j) is needed. In ℝ\R, let Tj=∑i=0j−1[ ⁣[i/j, i/j+1/(2j)] ⁣]T_j = \sum_{i=0}^{j-1} [\![i/j, \, i/j + 1/(2j)]\!], integral 11-currents in [0,1][0, 1] with mass 12\frac{1}{2} and 𝐌(∂Tj)=2j\mathbf{M}(\partial T_j) = 2j. They converge weakly to 12[ ⁣[0,1] ⁣]\frac{1}{2} [\![0, 1]\!], which has multiplicity 12\frac{1}{2} and is not an integral current.

Going deeper

For a student

The theorem is the compactness step of the direct method of the calculus of variations for currents. Combined with lower semicontinuity of mass, it solves the Plateau problem for integral currents in every dimension and codimension. Regularity theory, such as the results of De Giorgi, Almgren and Allard, then shows that the minimisers are smooth away from a small singular set. The same compactness, with the flat norm, underlies the theory of flat chains and of minimal surfaces obtained by min-max methods.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 5 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Area-minimizing current concept
  2. Current concept
  3. Flat norm concept
  4. Integral current concept
  5. Federer–Fleming compactness theorem statement

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Current_(mathematics)
About this page
TagTPXYARH912
URIm2://TPXYARH912
Kindstatement, theorem
WritingW0 stub
MSC49Q15, 28A75, 49Q20
StatusThis copy of the site has no build data. Run m2 status TPXYARH912.
AboutIntegral current
UsesIntegral current, Flat norm, Current, Area-minimizing current

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.