Math 2.0

Algebraic geometry Cohomology Theorem

Hard Lefschetz theorem

Builds on Projective varietySingular cohomologyCup product

Statement

Let X⊂ℙℂNX \subset \mathbb{P}^N_{\C} be a smooth complex projective variety of dimension nn. Let ω∈H2(X,ℚ)\omega \in H^2(X, \Q) be the class of a hyperplane section X∩HX \cap H, in singular cohomology. Let L ⁣:Hj(X,ℚ)→Hj+2(X,ℚ)L \colon H^j(X, \Q) \to H^{j+2}(X, \Q) be the map α↦ω⌣α\alpha \mapsto \omega \smile \alpha, given by the cup product. Then for each integer kk with 0≤k≤n0 \le k \le n, the map Lk ⁣:Hn−k(X,ℚ)→Hn+k(X,ℚ)L^k \colon H^{n-k}(X, \Q) \to H^{n+k}(X, \Q) is an isomorphism.

Remarks

The classical proof uses Hodge theory on the Kähler manifold X(ℂ)X(\C). The operator LL, its adjoint Λ\Lambda and the degree operator form a representation of 𝔰𝔩2\mathfrak{sl}_2 on harmonic forms, and LkL^k is an isomorphism by the representation theory of 𝔰𝔩2\mathfrak{sl}_2. For X=ℙnX = \mathbb{P}^n, H2i(X,ℚ)=ℚ ωiH^{2i}(X, \Q) = \Q \, \omega^i for 0≤i≤n0 \le i \le n and the odd groups vanish, so LkL^k sends ω(n−k)/2\omega^{(n-k)/2} to ω(n+k)/2\omega^{(n+k)/2}, which is a basis. The theorem shows that L ⁣:Hj→Hj+2L \colon H^j \to H^{j+2} is injective for j<nj < n, so the Betti numbers satisfy bj≤bj+2b_j \le b_{j+2} for j<nj < n, and also bj=b2n−jb_j = b_{2n-j}. Over a field of positive characteristic, Deligne proved the analogue for ℓ\ell-adic cohomology. The hypothesis that ω\omega comes from an ample class matters: for a class ω\omega with ωn=0\omega^n = 0, such as 00, the map Ln ⁣:H0→H2nL^n \colon H^0 \to H^{2n} is zero.

Going deeper

For a student

The theorem gives the Lefschetz decomposition of H∗(X,ℚ)H^*(X, \Q) into primitive parts, and together with the Hodge–Riemann bilinear relations it shows that the cohomology carries a polarized Hodge structure. It is one of the standard tools that restrict which manifolds can be projective varieties: for example, the sequences b0,b2,b4,…b_0, b_2, b_4, \ldots and b1,b3,b5,…b_1, b_3, b_5, \ldots cannot decrease before the middle degree. It complements the Lefschetz hyperplane theorem, which compares the cohomology of XX with that of a hyperplane section below the middle degree. Grothendieck's Lefschetz-type standard conjecture asks that the inverse of LkL^k come from an algebraic cycle.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 4 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Cup product concept
  2. Projective variety concept
  3. Singular cohomology concept
  4. Hard Lefschetz theorem statement

Where this leads

1 page builds on this one.

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lefschetz_hyperplane_theorem
About this page
Tag816AHR3DRT
URIm2://816AHR3DRT
Kindstatement, theorem
WritingW0 stub
MSC14F45, 14C30, 14F25
StatusThis copy of the site has no build data. Run m2 status 816AHR3DRT.
AboutProjective variety, Singular cohomology
UsesProjective variety, Singular cohomology, Cup product

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

Used by