Math 2.0

Number theory Congruences Theorem

Hensel's lemma

Builds on Congruence modulo nPrime number

Statement

Let pp be a prime number, and let ff be a polynomial with integer coefficients, with derivative f′f'. Let rr be an integer such that f(r)≡0(modp)f(r) \equiv 0 \pmod p and f′(r)≢0(modp)f'(r) \not\equiv 0 \pmod p. Then for each positive integer kk there is an integer rkr_k with rk≡r(modp)r_k \equiv r \pmod p and f(rk)≡0(modpk)f(r_k) \equiv 0 \pmod{p^k}. This rkr_k is unique modulo pkp^k.

Remarks

The proof gives the lifts step by step. If f(rk)≡0(modpk)f(r_k) \equiv 0 \pmod{p^k} and tt is an inverse of f′(r)f'(r) modulo pp, then rk+1=rk−tf(rk)r_{k+1} = r_k - t f(r_k) is a root modulo pk+1p^{k+1}. For example, 32≡2(mod7)3^2 \equiv 2 \pmod 7 and f′(3)=6f'(3) = 6 for f=x2−2f = x^2 - 2. The step gives 3−6⋅7=−39≡10(mod49)3 - 6 \cdot 7 = -39 \equiv 10 \pmod{49}, and 102=100≡2(mod49)10^2 = 100 \equiv 2 \pmod{49}. In the language of pp-adic numbers, a simple root modulo pp lifts to a unique root in the pp-adic integers. The lemma is the analogue of Newton's method for congruences.

History

The lemma is named after Kurt Hensel.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 4 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Divisibility definition
  2. Congruence modulo n definition
  3. Prime number definition
  4. Hensel's lemma statement

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hensel%27s_lemma, Lifting simple roots
About this page
Tag010QVB71T2
URIm2://010QVB71T2
Kindstatement, theorem
WritingW1 stated
MSC11A07
StatusThis copy of the site has no build data. Run m2 status 010QVB71T2.
UsesCongruence modulo n, Prime number
Same as

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W2

  • edge about out: the concepts that the statement is about (0 of 1)
  • edge proves in: at least one proof node (0 of 1)
  • edge instance_of or illustrates in: one example that shows the statement at work (0 of 1)
  • explanation L2 (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.