Math 2.0

Approximations and expansions Rates of approximation: direct and inverse theorems Theorem

Jackson's inequality

Builds on Trigonometric polynomialModulus of continuityPeriodic functionError of best approximationJackson kernel

Statement

Let r≥0r \ge 0 be an integer. For a continuous 2π2\pi-periodic function gg, let ω(g,δ)=sup⁡∣x−y∣≤δ∣g(x)−g(y)∣\omega(g, \delta) = \sup_{\abs{x - y} \le \delta} \abs{g(x) - g(y)} be its modulus of continuity. For n≥1n \ge 1, let En(f)=inf⁡Tmax⁡x∣f(x)−T(x)∣E_n(f) = \inf_T \max_x \abs{f(x) - T(x)}, the infimum over real trigonometric polynomials TT of degree at most nn. Then there is a constant CrC_r, depending only on rr, such that every 2π2\pi-periodic ff with rr continuous derivatives satisfies En(f)≤Crnr ω(f(r),1n)for all n≥1.E_n(f) \le \frac{C_r}{n^r} \, \omega\left(f^{(r)}, \frac{1}{n}\right) \qquad \text{for all } n \ge 1.

Remarks

Proof idea for r=0r = 0: approximate ff by its convolution with the Jackson kernel JmJ_m of degree at most nn. The kernel is nonnegative with mean 11, so ∣f−f∗Jm∣≤12π∫ω(f,∣t∣)Jm(t) dt\abs{f - f * J_m} \le \frac{1}{2\pi} \int \omega(f, \abs{t}) J_m(t) \, dt. With ω(f,∣t∣)≤(1+n∣t∣) ω(f,1/n)\omega(f, \abs{t}) \le (1 + n\abs{t}) \, \omega(f, 1/n) and 12π∫∣t∣Jm(t) dt=O(1/n)\frac{1}{2\pi} \int \abs{t} J_m(t) \, dt = O(1/n), the bound follows. The case r≥1r \ge 1 follows by induction on rr, using En(f)≤CnEn(f′)E_n(f) \le \frac{C}{n} E_n(f') for continuously differentiable 2π2\pi-periodic ff.

Example: if ff is Lipschitz with constant LL, then ω(f,1/n)≤L/n\omega(f, 1/n) \le L/n, so En(f)≤C0L/nE_n(f) \le C_0 L / n.

The same bounds hold for algebraic polynomials of degree at most nn on [−1,1][-1, 1] when r=0r = 0, through the substitution x=cos⁡θx = \cos \theta. For ∣f(r)∣≤1\abs{f^{(r)}} \le 1 with r≥1r \ge 1, the sharp bound is En(f)≤Kr/(n+1)rE_n(f) \le K_r / (n + 1)^r, where KrK_r is the Favard constant, by Favard's theorem.

Going deeper

For a student

This is the basic direct theorem of approximation theory. Its converse, Bernstein's inverse theorem, shows that the rates it gives are the right ones when 0<α<10 < \alpha < 1 in the Hölder scale. Together with Bernstein's inequality, it underlies the characterisation of smoothness classes by approximation rates. For interpolation and Fourier partial sums, it combines with Lebesgue constants to give convergence results such as the Dini–Lipschitz test.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 6 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Error of best approximation concept
  2. Jackson kernel concept
  3. Modulus of continuity concept
  4. Periodic function concept
  5. Trigonometric polynomial concept
  6. Jackson's inequality statement

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jackson%27s_inequality
About this page
TagWQRT86VYA6
URIm2://WQRT86VYA6
Kindstatement, theorem
WritingW0 stub
MSC41A17, 42A10, 41A25
StatusThis copy of the site has no build data. Run m2 status WQRT86VYA6.
AboutDirect and inverse theorems of approximation
UsesTrigonometric polynomial, Modulus of continuity, Periodic function, Error of best approximation, Jackson kernel
Same as

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.