Math 2.0

Geometry Finite geometry Theorem

Kakeya problem over finite fields

Builds on Finite fieldPolynomials in several variablesKakeya set

Statement

Let 𝔽q\F_q be a finite field with qq elements and let nβ‰₯1n \ge 1. A Kakeya set in 𝔽qn\F_q^n is a set KβŠ†π”½qnK \subseteq \F_q^n such that for every xβˆˆπ”½qnβˆ–{0}x \in \F_q^n \setminus \set{0} there is yβˆˆπ”½qny \in \F_q^n with {y+tx:tβˆˆπ”½q}βŠ†K\set{y + t x : t \in \F_q} \subseteq K. Then every Kakeya set KK in 𝔽qn\F_q^n satisfies ∣K∣β‰₯(q+nβˆ’1n)β‰₯qnn!.\abs{K} \ge \binom{q + n - 1}{n} \ge \frac{q^n}{n!}.

Remarks

This is Dvir's theorem, which answered the finite field analogue of the Kakeya problem asked by Thomas Wolff. The proof uses the polynomial method. If ∣K∣<(q+nβˆ’1n)\abs{K} < \binom{q + n - 1}{n}, the number of monomials of degree at most qβˆ’1q - 1 in nn variables, then some nonzero polynomial PP of degree d≀qβˆ’1d \le q - 1 vanishes on KK. Let PdP_d be the top-degree homogeneous part of PP. Restricting PP to a line y+txy + t x inside KK gives a polynomial in tt of degree at most d<qd < q with qq roots, so it is zero. Its coefficient of tdt^d is Pd(x)P_d(x), so Pd(x)=0P_d(x) = 0. So PdP_d vanishes on all of 𝔽qn\F_q^n, which is impossible for a nonzero polynomial of degree less than qq in each variable.

For n=1n = 1 the bound gives ∣K∣β‰₯q\abs{K} \ge q, and indeed KK must be the whole line 𝔽q\F_q. For n=2n = 2 it gives ∣K∣β‰₯q(q+1)/2\abs{K} \ge q(q + 1)/2.

Going deeper

For a student

Dvir's proof is a few lines long and made the polynomial method a standard tool in combinatorics. The idea is that a set too small cannot avoid being the zero set of a low-degree polynomial, while lines in all directions force the polynomial to vanish identically. The constant 1/n!1/n! has since been improved, but the order qnq^n is optimal. The finite field result does not solve the Euclidean Kakeya conjecture, whose difficulty comes from the multiscale structure of ℝn\R^n.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 4 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Finite field concept
  2. Kakeya set object
  3. Polynomials in several variables concept
  4. Kakeya problem over finite fields statement

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kakeya_set
About this page
TagKSW18V47ZD
URIm2://KSW18V47ZD
Kindstatement, theorem
WritingW0 stub
MSC51E20, 05B25, 11T06
StatusThis copy of the site has no build data. Run m2 status KSW18V47ZD.
AboutKakeya set
UsesFinite field, Polynomials in several variables, Kakeya set

Markdown Β· JSON Β· Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.