Math 2.0

Probability theory and stochastic processes Theorem

Khintchine inequality

Builds on Random variableExpected value

Statement

Let 0<p<∞0 < p < \infty. Let ε1,ε2,…\varepsilon_1, \varepsilon_2, \ldots be independent random variables with Pr⁡(εk=1)=Pr⁡(εk=−1)=1/2\Pr(\varepsilon_k = 1) = \Pr(\varepsilon_k = -1) = 1/2. Then there are constants Ap>0A_p > 0 and Bp>0B_p > 0, depending only on pp, with the following property. For every N≥1N \ge 1 and all real numbers a1,…,aNa_1, \ldots, a_N, Ap(∑k=1Nak2)1/2≤(𝔼∣∑k=1Nakεk∣p)1/p≤Bp(∑k=1Nak2)1/2,A_p \Big( \sum_{k=1}^{N} a_k^2 \Big)^{1/2} \le \Big( \mathbb{E} \Big\lvert \sum_{k=1}^{N} a_k \varepsilon_k \Big\rvert^p \Big)^{1/p} \le B_p \Big( \sum_{k=1}^{N} a_k^2 \Big)^{1/2}, where 𝔼\mathbb{E} is the expected value.

Remarks

For p=2p = 2 the middle term equals (∑ak2)1/2\left(\sum a_k^2\right)^{1/2} exactly, since 𝔼[εjεk]=0\mathbb{E}[\varepsilon_j \varepsilon_k] = 0 for j≠kj \ne k. So one can take Ap=1A_p = 1 for p≥2p \ge 2 and Bp=1B_p = 1 for p≤2p \le 2, by monotonicity of LpL^p norms on a probability space.

Proof idea for the upper bound: normalize to ∑ak2=1\sum a_k^2 = 1. Since cosh⁡t≤et2/2\cosh t \le e^{t^2/2}, independence gives 𝔼exp⁡(t∑akεk)≤et2/2\mathbb{E} \exp\left(t \sum a_k \varepsilon_k\right) \le e^{t^2/2} for all real tt. This gives the tail bound Pr⁡(∣∑akεk∣>s)≤2e−s2/2\Pr\left(\abs{\sum a_k \varepsilon_k} > s\right) \le 2 e^{-s^2/2}, and integrating the tail bounds every moment. The lower bound for p<2p < 2 follows from the upper bound for some q>2q > 2 by Hölder's inequality, which places L2L^2 between LpL^p and LqL^q.

Example: for N=2N = 2, a1=a2=1a_1 = a_2 = 1 and p=1p = 1, the sum ε1+ε2\varepsilon_1 + \varepsilon_2 is ±2\pm 2 with probability 1/21/2 and 00 otherwise, so 𝔼∣ε1+ε2∣=1=12⋅2\mathbb{E}\abs{\varepsilon_1 + \varepsilon_2} = 1 = \frac{1}{\sqrt 2} \cdot \sqrt 2. This shows that A1≤1/2A_1 \le 1/\sqrt 2; Szarek proved that A1=1/2A_1 = 1/\sqrt 2 is the best constant.

Going deeper

For a student

In harmonic analysis the εk\varepsilon_k are realized as the Rademacher functions rk(t)=sgn⁡sin⁡(2kπt)r_k(t) = \operatorname{sgn} \sin(2^k \pi t) on [0,1][0, 1], and the inequality says that all LpL^p norms are equivalent on their span. Combined with Fubini's theorem it turns square-function estimates into estimates for random sums, a basic step in Littlewood–Paley theory. In Banach space theory it is the starting point of the notions of type and cotype.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 3 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Expected value concept
  2. Random variable concept
  3. Khintchine inequality statement

Where this leads

1 page builds on this one.

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khintchine_inequality
About this page
TagAGWMZ50SSZ
URIm2://AGWMZ50SSZ
Kindstatement, theorem
WritingW0 stub
MSC60E15, 42A61, 46B09
StatusThis copy of the site has no build data. Run m2 status AGWMZ50SSZ.
AboutRandom variable
UsesRandom variable, Expected value
Same as

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

Used by