Math 2.0

Differential geometry Riemannian and pseudo-Riemannian manifolds Theorem

Nash embedding theorems

Builds on Riemannian manifoldRiemannian metric

Statement

Let (M,g)(M, g) be a Riemannian manifold of dimension mm. Write ⟨⋅,⋅⟩\ip{\cdot}{\cdot} for the Euclidean inner product on ℝn\R^n. An isometric embedding of (M,g)(M, g) into ℝn\R^n is an embedding f ⁣:M→ℝnf \colon M \to \R^n with ⟨dfp(v),dfp(w)⟩=gp(v,w)\ip{df_p(v)}{df_p(w)} = g_p(v, w) for all p∈Mp \in M and v,w∈TpMv, w \in T_pM.

  1. (C1C^1 theorem, Nash and Kuiper.) Let n≥m+1n \ge m + 1 and let f ⁣:M→ℝnf \colon M \to \R^n be a smooth embedding that is short, that is ∣dfp(v)∣2<gp(v,v)\abs{df_p(v)}^2 < g_p(v, v) for all pp and all nonzero v∈TpMv \in T_pM. Then for every ε>0\varepsilon > 0 there is a C1C^1 embedding f~ ⁣:M→ℝn\tilde f \colon M \to \R^n that is isometric for gg and satisfies ∣f~(p)−f(p)∣<ε\abs{\tilde f(p) - f(p)} < \varepsilon for all p∈Mp \in M.
  2. (CkC^k theorem, Nash.) Let 3≤k≤∞3 \le k \le \infty and let gg be of class CkC^k. Then (M,g)(M, g) has an isometric embedding of class CkC^k into ℝn\R^n. Here n=m(3m+11)/2n = m(3m + 11)/2 if MM is compact, and n=m(m+1)(3m+11)/2n = m(m + 1)(3m + 11)/2 otherwise.

Remarks

Part 2 is proved by solving the nonlinear system f∗⟨⋅,⋅⟩=gf^*\ip{\cdot}{\cdot} = g with an iteration that combines Newton's method with smoothing operators, the Nash–Moser technique. Part 1 is proved by convex integration: one adds many small fast oscillations that increase lengths in a controlled way. An example of part 1: the flat square torus ℝ2/ℤ2\R^2 / \Z^2 has a C1C^1 isometric embedding into ℝ3\R^3. It has no C2C^2 isometric embedding there, because a compact surface in ℝ3\R^3 has a point of positive Gaussian curvature, while the flat torus has curvature 00. So the low codimension in part 1 really needs the low regularity C1C^1. Nash proved part 1 with n≥m+2n \ge m + 2, and Kuiper extended it to n≥m+1n \ge m + 1.

Going deeper

For a student

The Whitney embedding theorem embeds a manifold in ℝ2m\R^{2m} but ignores the metric; Nash's theorems make the embedding respect the metric at the cost of more dimensions or less smoothness. The C1C^1 theorem is an early instance of the h-principle: a short embedding can be deformed into an isometric one by arbitrarily small moves. The bounds on nn in part 2 have been lowered by later work, but the existence statement is what is used in practice.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 3 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Riemannian manifold concept
  2. Riemannian metric concept
  3. Nash embedding theorems statement

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nash_embedding_theorems
About this page
Tag8YQJQXQHVE
URIm2://8YQJQXQHVE
Kindstatement, theorem
WritingW0 stub
MSC53C42, 53B20
StatusThis copy of the site has no build data. Run m2 status 8YQJQXQHVE.
AboutRiemannian manifold
UsesRiemannian manifold, Riemannian metric
Same as

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.