Math 2.0

Integral transforms, operational calculus Moment problems Proposition

Positivity of Hankel matrices of moments

Builds on MeasureMomentHankel matrixPositive semidefinite matrixPositive definite matrixSupport of a measure

Statement

Let μ\mu be a positive Borel measure on ℝ\R such that every moment mk=∫xk dμ(x)m_k = \int x^k \, d\mu(x), k≥0k \ge 0, is finite. For n≥0n \ge 0, let Hn=(mj+k)j,k=0nH_n = (m_{j+k})_{j,k=0}^{n} be the (n+1)×(n+1)(n+1) \times (n+1) Hankel matrix of the moments. Then:

  1. HnH_n is positive semidefinite for every n≥0n \ge 0.
  2. If the support of μ\mu is an infinite set, then HnH_n is positive definite for every n≥0n \ge 0, so det⁡Hn>0\det H_n > 0.

Remarks

For real c=(c0,…,cn)c = (c_0, \ldots, c_n), let p(x)=∑j=0ncjxjp(x) = \sum_{j=0}^{n} c_j x^j. Then cTHnc=∑j,kcjck∫xj+k dμ=∫p(x)2 dμ(x)≥0c^{T} H_n c = \sum_{j,k} c_j c_k \int x^{j+k} \, d\mu = \int p(x)^2 \, d\mu(x) \ge 0, which is clause 1. If c≠0c \ne 0, then pp is a nonzero polynomial with at most nn real roots. If the support is infinite, then p2>0p^2 > 0 on a set of positive measure, so the integral is positive, which is clause 2. Example: for Lebesgue measure on [0,1][0, 1], mk=1/(k+1)m_k = 1/(k+1), and HnH_n is the Hilbert matrix (1/(j+k+1))(1/(j + k + 1)), which is positive definite. For μ=δ0\mu = \delta_0, the support is finite, HnH_n has m0=1m_0 = 1 in one corner and zeros elsewhere, and it is only semidefinite for n≥1n \ge 1. The converse of clause 1 is Hamburger's theorem, part of the Hamburger moment problem. It says that a real sequence with all HnH_n positive semidefinite is the moment sequence of a positive measure on ℝ\R.

Going deeper

For a student

This is the necessary condition in the Hamburger moment problem, and Hamburger showed that it is also sufficient. For the Stieltjes problem on [0,∞)[0, \infty) one adds the shifted Hankel matrices (mj+k+1)(m_{j+k+1}), whose positivity reflects x≥0x \ge 0. The positive definite case gives an inner product ⟨p,q⟩=∫pq dμ\ip{p}{q} = \int p q \, d\mu on polynomials, and Gram–Schmidt then yields the orthogonal polynomials of μ\mu.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 7 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Hankel matrix concept
  2. Measure concept
  3. Moment concept
  4. Positive definite matrix concept
  5. Positive semidefinite matrix concept
  6. Support of a measure concept
  7. Positivity of Hankel matrices of moments statement

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hankel_matrix
  2. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamburger_moment_problem
About this page
TagCJCPD4DZ65
URIm2://CJCPD4DZ65
Kindstatement, proposition
WritingW0 stub
MSC44A60, 15B05
StatusThis copy of the site has no build data. Run m2 status CJCPD4DZ65.
AboutHankel matrix, Moment
UsesMeasure, Moment, Hankel matrix, Positive semidefinite matrix, Positive definite matrix, Support of a measure

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.