Math 2.0

Numerical analysis Ordinary differential equations Proposition

Predictor–corrector method

Builds on Linear multistep methodInitial value problem

Statement

Let f ⁣:ℝ×ℝd→ℝdf \colon \R \times \R^d \to \R^d be sufficiently smooth, and consider the initial value problem y′=f(t,y)y' = f(t, y), y(t0)=y0y(t_0) = y_0. Let PP be an explicit linear multistep method of order p∗≥1p^* \ge 1, the predictor. Let CC be an implicit linear multistep method of order p≥1p \ge 1, the corrector. One step of the PECE mode with step size hh does the following:

  1. P: compute a predicted value yn+1[0]y_{n+1}^{[0]} with PP.
  2. E: evaluate fn+1[0]=f(tn+1,yn+1[0])f_{n+1}^{[0]} = f(t_{n+1}, y_{n+1}^{[0]}).
  3. C: compute yn+1y_{n+1} with the formula of CC, where fn+1[0]f_{n+1}^{[0]} replaces the unknown value f(tn+1,yn+1)f(t_{n+1}, y_{n+1}).
  4. E: evaluate fn+1=f(tn+1,yn+1)f_{n+1} = f(t_{n+1}, y_{n+1}) for use in later steps.

Then the PECE method is an explicit method of order min⁡(p,p∗+1)\min(p, p^* + 1). If p∗≥pp^* \ge p, its principal local truncation error equals that of the corrector.

Remarks

The corrector is applied once instead of being iterated to convergence, so no nonlinear equation is solved. The error of the predicted value is O(hp∗+1)O(h^{p^*+1}). It enters the corrected value multiplied by hh times a coefficient of the corrector, so it adds O(hp∗+2)O(h^{p^*+2}) to the local error. Comparing this with the local error O(hp+1)O(h^{p+1}) of the corrector gives the order min⁡(p,p∗+1)\min(p, p^*+1). Example: the Euler method (p∗=1p^* = 1) as predictor and the trapezoidal rule (p=2p = 2) as corrector give Heun's method, of order min⁡(2,2)=2\min(2, 2) = 2. When p∗=pp^* = p, the difference yn+1−yn+1[0]y_{n+1} - y_{n+1}^{[0]} gives an estimate of the local error (Milne's device), which is used for adaptive step size control.

Going deeper

For a student

The Adams–Bashforth–Moulton pairs are the standard example: an Adams–Bashforth predictor with an Adams–Moulton corrector of the same order. The PECE method has the same order as the corrector, but its stability region is different and is in general smaller than that of the corrector. So predictor-corrector methods are not suited to stiff equations, where one solves the implicit equations with Newton's method instead.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 3 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Initial value problem concept
  2. Linear multistep method concept
  3. Predictor–corrector method statement

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predictor%E2%80%93corrector_method
About this page
TagMHGV8HCAQR
URIm2://MHGV8HCAQR
Kindstatement, proposition
WritingW0 stub
MSC65L06, 65L05
StatusThis copy of the site has no build data. Run m2 status MHGV8HCAQR.
AboutLinear multistep method
UsesLinear multistep method, Initial value problem

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.