Partial differential equations First-order equations and conservation laws Theorem
Rankine–Hugoniot conditions
Builds on Conservation lawWeak solution
Statement
Let be a function and consider the system of conservation laws in one space dimension. Let be open, and let be a curve with of class . Assume that splits into a left part and a right part . Let be bounded and of class on and on . Assume that has one-sided limits from and from at , continuous in . Then is a weak solution in if and only if solves the equation classically in and in , and
Remarks
Write for the jump across the curve; then the condition is with shock speed . The proof tests the weak formulation with a test function supported near a point of . On each side is a classical solution, so integrating by parts on and on leaves only boundary integrals over . These combine to for all test functions, which gives the jump condition.
Example: for the scalar Burgers' equation, , the condition gives . So a jump from to moves at speed .
The conditions are necessary but do not select a unique solution. A jump from to for Burgers' equation also satisfies them and gives a weak solution, but not the physical one. An entropy condition is needed in addition. In several space dimensions the same argument gives , where is a normal to the surface of discontinuity.
Going deeper
For a student
The theorem shows that piecewise smooth weak solutions are exactly the piecewise classical solutions whose jumps obey the Rankine–Hugoniot relations. It is used to construct explicit solutions, for example of the Riemann problem, and to check proposed shock solutions. Since it allows non-physical jumps, it is always combined with an entropy condition such as the Lax condition, which leads to the notion of entropy solution. For a system, the set of states that can be joined to a given is the Hugoniot locus. For a strictly hyperbolic system, near it consists of curves through .
Reading path
To understand this page from the ground up, read these 3 pages in order. The foundations come first.
Show the path as a graph
- no evidence level
- Conservation law concept
- Weak solution concept
- Rankine–Hugoniot conditions statement
Further reading
About this page
| Tag | S4XMYJ3V42 |
|---|---|
| URI | m2://S4XMYJ3V42 |
| Kind | statement, theorem |
| Writing | W0 stub |
| MSC | 35L67, 35L65, 76L05 |
| Status | This copy of the site has no build data. Run m2 status S4XMYJ3V42. |
| About | Conservation law |
| Uses | Conservation law, Weak solution |
| Same as |
Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub
What this page needs for W1
- an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
- a source with a locator (0 of 1)
The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.
What links here
No page links to this page yet.