Math 2.0

Dynamical systems and ergodic theory Ergodic theory Theorem

Shannon–McMillan–Breiman theorem

Builds on Probability spaceMeasure-preserving transformationErgodic transformationKolmogorov–Sinai entropyAlmost everywherePartition of a set

Statement

Let (X,ℬ,μ)(X, \mathcal{B}, \mu) be a probability space and let T ⁣:X→XT \colon X \to X be an ergodic measure-preserving transformation. Let 𝒫\mathcal{P} be a finite measurable partition of XX. Let h(T,𝒫)h(T, \mathcal{P}) be the entropy of TT with respect to 𝒫\mathcal{P}, as in the definition of the Kolmogorov–Sinai entropy. For n≥1n \ge 1 and x∈Xx \in X, let 𝒫n(x)\mathcal{P}_n(x) be the set of the partition ⋁i=0n−1T−i𝒫\bigvee_{i=0}^{n-1} T^{-i}\mathcal{P} that contains xx. Then lim⁡n→∞−1nlog⁡μ(𝒫n(x))=h(T,𝒫)\lim_{n \to \infty} -\frac{1}{n} \log \mu(\mathcal{P}_n(x)) = h(T, \mathcal{P}) for almost every x∈Xx \in X, and also in L1(μ)L^1(\mu).

Remarks

The set 𝒫n(x)\mathcal{P}_n(x) consists of the points whose first nn positions x,Tx,…,Tn−1xx, Tx, \dots, T^{n-1}x lie in the same sets of 𝒫\mathcal{P} as those of xx. The function −log⁡μ(𝒫n(x))-\log \mu(\mathcal{P}_n(x)) is the information carried by these nn symbols, and its integral is H(⋁i=0n−1T−i𝒫)H(\bigvee_{i=0}^{n-1} T^{-i}\mathcal{P}). So the convergence in L1L^1 refines the definition of h(T,𝒫)h(T, \mathcal{P}), and the theorem says that the information per symbol is almost surely constant. The proof writes the information as a Birkhoff sum of conditional information functions, plus an error, and applies Birkhoff's ergodic theorem together with the martingale convergence theorem. Shannon proved convergence in probability for ergodic Markov sources, McMillan proved L1L^1 convergence for stationary ergodic sources, and Breiman proved almost sure convergence. Example: for the Bernoulli scheme B(p1,…,pk)B(p_1, \dots, p_k) with the partition by the zeroth coordinate, μ(𝒫n(x))=px0⋯pxn−1\mu(\mathcal{P}_n(x)) = p_{x_0} \cdots p_{x_{n-1}}, and the theorem is the strong law of large numbers for the i.i.d. variables −log⁡pxi-\log p_{x_i}, whose mean is −∑pilog⁡pi-\sum p_i \log p_i. Without ergodicity the limit still exists almost everywhere, but it is an invariant function whose integral is h(T,𝒫)h(T, \mathcal{P}).

Going deeper

For a student

This is the asymptotic equipartition property, the basis of data compression: about nhnh nats, or nh/log⁡2nh / \log 2 bits, suffice to encode a typical message of length nn. In ergodic theory it gives a local, pointwise meaning to the Kolmogorov–Sinai entropy. It is a key tool in the proofs of the Ornstein isomorphism theorem and of Sinai's factor theorem, and it has analogues for actions of amenable groups.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 7 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Almost everywhere concept
  2. Ergodic transformation concept
  3. Kolmogorov–Sinai entropy concept
  4. Measure-preserving transformation concept
  5. Partition of a set concept
  6. Probability space concept
  7. Shannon–McMillan–Breiman theorem statement

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asymptotic_equipartition_property
About this page
TagHK8339ECNN
URIm2://HK8339ECNN
Kindstatement, theorem
WritingW0 stub
MSC37A35, 28D20, 94A17
StatusThis copy of the site has no build data. Run m2 status HK8339ECNN.
AboutKolmogorov–Sinai entropy
UsesProbability space, Measure-preserving transformation, Ergodic transformation, Kolmogorov–Sinai entropy, Almost everywhere, Partition of a set

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.