Math 2.0

Operator theory Theorem

Szegő limit theorems

Builds on Toeplitz matrixDeterminantFourier coefficientIntegrable function

Statement

Let f ⁣:ℝ→[0,∞)f \colon \R \to [0, \infty) be a 2π2\pi-periodic function, integrable on [−π,π][-\pi, \pi], with Fourier coefficients f^(k)=12π∫−ππf(θ)e−ikθ dθ\hat f(k) = \frac{1}{2\pi} \int_{-\pi}^{\pi} f(\theta) e^{-ik\theta} \, d\theta. For n≥1n \ge 1 let Tn(f)=(f^(j−k))j,k=0n−1T_n(f) = (\hat f(j - k))_{j,k=0}^{n-1} be the n×nn \times n Toeplitz matrix of ff, and let Dn(f)=det⁡Tn(f)D_n(f) = \det T_n(f) be its determinant.

  1. (First Szegő theorem.) If log⁡f\log f is integrable, then lim⁡n→∞Dn(f)1/n=G(f),G(f)=exp⁡(12π∫−ππlog⁡f(θ) dθ).\lim_{n \to \infty} D_n(f)^{1/n} = G(f), \qquad G(f) = \exp\left( \frac{1}{2\pi} \int_{-\pi}^{\pi} \log f(\theta) \, d\theta \right).
  2. (Strong Szegő theorem.) Assume f=egf = e^{g} with gg real-valued and continuous, with Fourier coefficients satisfying ∑k∈ℤ∣g^(k)∣<∞\sum_{k \in \Z} \abs{\hat g(k)} < \infty and ∑k∈ℤ∣k∣∣g^(k)∣2<∞\sum_{k \in \Z} \abs{k} \abs{\hat g(k)}^2 < \infty. Then lim⁡n→∞Dn(f)G(f)n=exp⁡(∑k=1∞k g^(k)g^(−k))=exp⁡(∑k=1∞k∣g^(k)∣2).\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{D_n(f)}{G(f)^n} = \exp\left( \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} k \, \hat g(k) \hat g(-k) \right) = \exp\left( \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} k \abs{\hat g(k)}^2 \right).

Remarks

Proof idea for the first theorem: the ratio Dn+1(f)/Dn(f)D_{n+1}(f) / D_n(f) is the minimum of 12π∫−ππ∣p(eiθ)∣2f(θ) dθ\frac{1}{2\pi} \int_{-\pi}^{\pi} \abs{p(e^{i\theta})}^2 f(\theta) \, d\theta over polynomials p(z)=1+a1z+⋯+anznp(z) = 1 + a_1 z + \cdots + a_n z^n. These minima decrease to G(f)G(f) by Szegő's theorem on prediction, and then the geometric means Dn1/nD_n^{1/n} have the same limit. The strong theorem gives the next term of the asymptotics, Dn(f)∼E(f) G(f)nD_n(f) \sim E(f) \, G(f)^n with the constant E(f)E(f) above.

Example: let f(θ)=∣1−aeiθ∣2f(\theta) = \abs{1 - a e^{i\theta}}^2 with ∣a∣<1\abs{a} < 1. Then Tn(f)T_n(f) is tridiagonal with diagonal 1+∣a∣21 + \abs{a}^2, and Dn(f)=1−∣a∣2(n+1)1−∣a∣2D_n(f) = \frac{1 - \abs{a}^{2(n+1)}}{1 - \abs{a}^2}. Here g=log⁡fg = \log f has g^(0)=0\hat g(0) = 0 and g^(k)=−ak/k\hat g(k) = -a^k / k for k≥1k \ge 1, so G(f)=1G(f) = 1 and the strong theorem predicts the limit exp⁡(∑k≥1∣a∣2k/k)=11−∣a∣2\exp\left(\sum_{k \ge 1} \abs{a}^{2k}/k\right) = \frac{1}{1 - \abs{a}^2}, as the formula confirms.

Szegő proved the first theorem in 1915 and the strong theorem in 1952, motivated by the computation of the spontaneous magnetization of the two-dimensional Ising model. The strong theorem was later proved under weaker hypotheses, essentially only the condition ∑∣k∣∣g^(k)∣2<∞\sum \abs{k} \abs{\hat g(k)}^2 < \infty.

Going deeper

For a student

The theorems are the analogue for Toeplitz matrices of the fact that the determinant of a diagonal matrix is the product of its entries. The first theorem is closely tied to orthogonal polynomials on the unit circle and to prediction theory of stationary sequences. The strong theorem has applications in statistical mechanics and in random matrix theory, where such determinants compute averages over the unitary group.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 5 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Determinant concept
  2. Fourier coefficient concept
  3. Integrable function concept
  4. Toeplitz matrix concept
  5. Szegő limit theorems statement

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Szeg%C5%91_limit_theorems
About this page
TagWNJPRHZ680
URIm2://WNJPRHZ680
Kindstatement, theorem
WritingW0 stub
MSC47B35, 42C05, 15B05
StatusThis copy of the site has no build data. Run m2 status WNJPRHZ680.
AboutToeplitz matrix, Determinant
UsesToeplitz matrix, Determinant, Fourier coefficient, Integrable function
Same as

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.