Algebraic geometry Surfaces and higher-dimensional varieties Theorem
Enriques–Kodaira classification
Builds on Algebraic surfaceKodaira dimensionCanonical bundleRuled surfaceK3 surfaceEnriques surfaceElliptic surfaceSurface of general typeAbelian varietyCastelnuovo's contraction theoremCastelnuovo's rationality criterion
Statement
Let be a smooth projective algebraic surface over that is minimal, meaning that it contains no smooth rational curve with . Let be its Kodaira dimension and its canonical divisor. Then exactly one of the following holds.
- , and is the projective plane or a ruled surface over a smooth projective curve .
- , and is a K3 surface, an Enriques surface, an abelian surface or a bielliptic surface. In each case .
- , and is an elliptic surface.
- , and is a surface of general type.
Moreover, every smooth projective surface is obtained from a minimal one by finitely many blow-ups of points, and if this minimal model is unique.
Remarks
The reduction to minimal surfaces uses Castelnuovo's contraction theorem: a smooth rational curve with self-intersection can be blown down to a smooth point, which lowers the second Betti number. For each value of , the finer classification uses the invariants , , the plurigenera , and the Chern numbers and . Castelnuovo's rationality criterion is the key step for . Kodaira extended the classification to all compact complex surfaces, which adds non-algebraic classes such as surfaces of class VII and Kodaira surfaces. Bombieri and Mumford extended it to algebraically closed fields of positive characteristic, where new classes appear in characteristics and . Example: a smooth quartic surface in has by adjunction and lands in case 2 as a K3 surface. A smooth quintic surface has ample and lands in case 4.
Going deeper
For a student
The classification is the two-dimensional model of the minimal model program. In dimension one, curves split by genus into , and , which matches ; for surfaces there is one more class. The invariants that tell the classes apart are birational invariants, so they can be computed on any smooth model. Results like the Bogomolov–Miyaoka–Yau inequality constrain the invariants of the last class.
Reading path
To understand this page from the ground up, read these 18 pages in order. The foundations come first.
Show the path as a graph
- no evidence level
- Abelian variety concept
- Algebraic surface concept
- Algebraically closed field concept
- Blowing up concept
- Canonical bundle concept
- Elliptic surface concept
- Enriques surface concept
- Intersection theory concept
- K3 surface concept
- Kodaira dimension concept
- Projective space concept
- Rational surface concept
- Ruled surface concept
- Sheaf cohomology concept
- Surface of general type concept
- Castelnuovo's contraction theorem statement
- Castelnuovo's rationality criterion statement
- Enriques–Kodaira classification statement
Further reading
About this page
| Tag | 1GVF19KFAK |
|---|---|
| URI | m2://1GVF19KFAK |
| Kind | statement, theorem |
| Writing | W0 stub |
| MSC | 14J10, 32J15 |
| Status | This copy of the site has no build data. Run m2 status 1GVF19KFAK. |
| About | Algebraic surface, Kodaira dimension |
| Uses | Algebraic surface, Kodaira dimension, Canonical bundle, Ruled surface, K3 surface, Enriques surface, Elliptic surface, Surface of general type, Abelian variety, Castelnuovo's contraction theorem, Castelnuovo's rationality criterion |
| Same as |
Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub
What this page needs for W1
- an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
- a source with a locator (0 of 1)
The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.
What links here
No page links to this page yet.