Math 2.0

Order, lattices, ordered algebraic structures Modular and complemented lattices Theorem

Jordan–Hölder theorem for modular lattices

Builds on Modular latticeCovering relationMaximal chain

Statement

Let LL be a modular lattice and let a≤ba \le b in LL. Write x⋖yx \lessdot y when yy covers xx. For u≤vu \le v in LL, write [u,v]={z∈L:u≤z≤v}[u, v] = \set{z \in L : u \le z \le v}. Two such intervals are transposed if they have the form [x∧y,x][x \wedge y, x] and [y,x∨y][y, x \vee y] for some x,y∈Lx, y \in L, in either order. Two intervals are projective if they are joined by a finite sequence of intervals in which each consecutive pair is transposed.

Let a=x0⋖x1⋖⋯⋖xm=banda=y0⋖y1⋖⋯⋖yn=ba = x_0 \lessdot x_1 \lessdot \cdots \lessdot x_m = b \quad\text{and}\quad a = y_0 \lessdot y_1 \lessdot \cdots \lessdot y_n = b be two finite maximal chains from aa to bb. Then m=nm = n, and there is a permutation σ\sigma of {1,…,m}\set{1, \dots, m} such that [xi−1,xi][x_{i-1}, x_i] is projective to [yσ(i)−1,yσ(i)][y_{\sigma(i)-1}, y_{\sigma(i)}] for each ii.

Remarks

The proof is by induction on mm. If x1=y1x_1 = y_1, apply induction to the interval [x1,b][x_1, b]. Otherwise x1x_1 and y1y_1 both cover a=x1∧y1a = x_1 \wedge y_1, and modularity makes the transposed intervals [y1,x1∨y1][y_1, x_1 \vee y_1] and [a,x1][a, x_1] isomorphic, so x1∨y1x_1 \vee y_1 covers both x1x_1 and y1y_1. Choosing a maximal chain from x1∨y1x_1 \vee y_1 to bb and applying induction in [x1,b][x_1, b] and in [y1,b][y_1, b] gives the result.

Example: the lattice of submodules of a module MM is modular. For submodules XX and YY, the transposed intervals give the isomorphism X/(X∩Y)≅(X+Y)/YX / (X \cap Y) \cong (X + Y) / Y, so projective intervals of length one give isomorphic simple quotients. So the theorem yields the Jordan–Hölder theorem for modules: two composition series of a module have the same length and isomorphic factors up to order.

Without modularity the equal-length conclusion can fail. In the pentagon lattice N5, the maximal chains 0<a<c<10 < a < c < 1 and 0<b<10 < b < 1 have lengths 33 and 22.

Going deeper

For a student

The theorem shows that modular lattices satisfy the Jordan–Dedekind chain condition on every interval of finite length, so such intervals have a well-defined length. For submodule lattices it recovers the Jordan–Hölder theorem for modules, with projectivity of intervals giving isomorphism of factors. The Jordan–Hölder theorem for groups is a close relative, with subnormal series in place of chains of submodules. The same equal-length conclusion holds in semimodular lattices, which is why matroids and geometric lattices have a rank function.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 4 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Covering relation concept
  2. Maximal chain concept
  3. Modular lattice concept
  4. Jordan–Hölder theorem for modular lattices statement

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Composition_series
About this page
TagBCG5KM83AP
URIm2://BCG5KM83AP
Kindstatement, theorem
WritingW0 stub
MSC06C05, 06B05
StatusThis copy of the site has no build data. Run m2 status BCG5KM83AP.
AboutModular lattice
UsesModular lattice, Covering relation, Maximal chain

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.