Math 2.0

Dynamical systems and ergodic theory Ergodic theory Theorem

Sinai's factor theorem

Builds on Standard probability spaceMeasure-preserving transformationErgodic transformationBernoulli schemeKolmogorov–Sinai entropy

Statement

Let (X,ℬ,μ)(X, \mathcal{B}, \mu) be a standard probability space and let T ⁣:X→XT \colon X \to X be an invertible ergodic measure-preserving transformation with measurable inverse. Assume that its Kolmogorov–Sinai entropy hμ(T)h_\mu(T) is positive. Let BB be a two-sided Bernoulli scheme on a finite alphabet, acting on (Y,ν)(Y, \nu), with entropy h(B)≤hμ(T)h(B) \le h_\mu(T). Then BB is a factor of TT: there is a measurable map φ ⁣:X→Y\varphi \colon X \to Y with μ(φ−1C)=ν(C)\mu(\varphi^{-1}C) = \nu(C) for every measurable C⊆YC \subseteq Y and φ∘T=B∘φ\varphi \circ T = B \circ \varphi almost everywhere.

Remarks

A factor map can only lower entropy, so the hypothesis h(B)≤hμ(T)h(B) \le h_\mu(T) is necessary. Ergodicity is needed too. Let TT be the disjoint union, with weight 1/21/2 each, of a Bernoulli scheme B′B' and an identity map, so that hμ(T)=h(B′)/2>0h_\mu(T) = h(B')/2 > 0. Let BB be any Bernoulli scheme with at least two symbols of positive weight. A factor map φ\varphi onto BB satisfies φ(x)=B(φ(x))\varphi(x) = B(\varphi(x)) on the identity part. So it sends a set of measure 1/21/2 into the fixed points of BB, which form a null set. So TT has no such factor, whatever the entropy of BB. The proof constructs the factor map as a limit of finite codings, using the Rokhlin lemma to build towers and the Shannon–McMillan–Breiman theorem to count typical names. Example: an irrational rotation has entropy 00, so the theorem says nothing about it. Indeed it has no nontrivial Bernoulli factor, since every factor of a zero-entropy system has entropy 00. Example: every ergodic toral automorphism of positive entropy has Bernoulli factors of every entropy up to its own.

Going deeper

For a student

It was a step toward the Ornstein isomorphism theorem, whose proof sharpens the same kind of coding argument from factor maps to isomorphisms. It shows that positive entropy, a number defined by counting, forces a concrete structure: an independent process sitting inside the system.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 10 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Bernoulli process concept
  2. Ergodic transformation concept
  3. Infinite product measure concept
  4. Kolmogorov automorphism concept
  5. Kolmogorov–Sinai entropy concept
  6. Measure-preserving transformation concept
  7. Mixing concept
  8. Standard probability space concept
  9. Bernoulli scheme example
  10. Sinai's factor theorem statement

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measure-preserving_dynamical_system
About this page
TagACQ7A58XY7
URIm2://ACQ7A58XY7
Kindstatement, theorem
WritingW0 stub
MSC37A35, 28D20
StatusThis copy of the site has no build data. Run m2 status ACQ7A58XY7.
AboutBernoulli scheme, Kolmogorov–Sinai entropy
UsesStandard probability space, Measure-preserving transformation, Ergodic transformation, Bernoulli scheme, Kolmogorov–Sinai entropy

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.