Math 2.0

Probability theory and stochastic processes Theorem

Fukushima correspondence between Dirichlet forms and processes

Builds on Dirichlet formHunt processRadon measureLocally compact spaceContraction semigroupBeurling–Deny formula

Statement

Let XX be a locally compact separable metric space and let mm be a positive Radon measure on XX with full support. Let (ℰ,ℱ)(\mathcal{E}, \mathcal{F}) be a regular Dirichlet form on L2(X,m)L^2(X, m), and let (Tt)t≥0(T_t)_{t \ge 0} be the strongly continuous symmetric Markovian contraction semigroup on L2(X,m)L^2(X, m) associated with it. Then there is an mm-symmetric Hunt process MM on XX whose transition function (pt)t≥0(p_t)_{t \ge 0} satisfies, for every t>0t > 0 and every bounded Borel function f∈L2(X,m)f \in L^2(X, m): ptf=Ttfm-almost everywhere.p_t f = T_t f \quad m\text{-almost everywhere}. Such a process is unique up to equivalence. That is, two mm-symmetric Hunt processes with this property have the same transition functions outside a set of zero capacity for ℰ\mathcal{E}. This exceptional set can be chosen so that neither process enters it.

Remarks

The process is built from the semigroup, but the semigroup only acts on classes of functions defined almost everywhere. The difficulty is to choose good pointwise versions, and this is done with the capacity of ℰ\mathcal{E}. Every element of ℱ\mathcal{F} has a quasi-continuous version, which is continuous outside open sets of small capacity. Regularity of the form provides enough continuous functions in ℱ\mathcal{F} to separate points and to build the process on XX itself. Moreover ptfp_t f is a quasi-continuous version of TtfT_t f. Example: the form 12∫ℝn∇u⋅∇v dx\tfrac12 \int_{\R^n} \nabla u \cdot \nabla v \, dx on W1,2(ℝn)W^{1,2}(\R^n) corresponds to Brownian motion on ℝn\R^n. Ma and Röckner extended the correspondence to quasi-regular Dirichlet forms, which include forms on infinite-dimensional spaces.

Going deeper

For a student

The theorem is a central result of the monograph of Fukushima, Oshima and Takeda on Dirichlet forms. Together with the Beurling–Deny formula, it gives a meaning to the three parts of the form. The local part, the jumping measure and the killing measure describe the continuous motion, the jumps and the killing of the process. A regular Dirichlet form has the local property exactly when the process is a diffusion, that is, has continuous paths up to its lifetime. A nearly Borel set has zero capacity if and only if the process, started from mm-almost every point, never hits it, which gives a probabilistic meaning to capacity.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 7 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Contraction semigroup concept
  2. Dirichlet form concept
  3. Hunt process concept
  4. Locally compact space concept
  5. Radon measure concept
  6. Beurling–Deny formula statement
  7. Fukushima correspondence between Dirichlet forms and processes statement

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirichlet_form
About this page
Tag5PJF1NDCTT
URIm2://5PJF1NDCTT
Kindstatement, theorem
WritingW0 stub
MSC60J46, 31C25, 60J25
StatusThis copy of the site has no build data. Run m2 status 5PJF1NDCTT.
AboutDirichlet form, Hunt process
UsesDirichlet form, Hunt process, Radon measure, Locally compact space, Contraction semigroup, Beurling–Deny formula

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.