Math 2.0

Integral equations Systems of integral equations Theorem

Matrix Wiener–Hopf factorization

Builds on Wiener–Hopf factorizationSystem of linear integral equationsFourier transformInvertible matrixWinding numberRiemann–Hilbert problemWiener–Hopf equation

Statement

Let n≥1n \ge 1 and let KK be an n×nn \times n matrix of functions in L1(ℝ)L^1(\R). Write K^(ξ)=∫ℝK(x) eiξx dx\hat K(\xi) = \int_{\R} K(x)\, e^{i\xi x}\, dx entrywise, the Fourier transform, and let A(ξ)=I−K^(ξ)A(\xi) = I - \hat K(\xi). Assume that det⁡A(ξ)≠0\det A(\xi) \ne 0 for all ξ∈ℝ\xi \in \R, so that A(ξ)A(\xi) is an invertible matrix for every real ξ\xi. Let r(ξ)=(ξ−i)/(ξ+i)r(\xi) = (\xi - i)/(\xi + i). Then:

  1. There are n×nn \times n matrices K+K_+ and K−K_- of L1(ℝ)L^1(\R) functions, with K+=0K_+ = 0 on (−∞,0)(-\infty, 0) and K−=0K_- = 0 on (0,∞)(0, \infty). There are integers κ1≥κ2≥⋯≥κn\kappa_1 \ge \kappa_2 \ge \cdots \ge \kappa_n such that A(ξ)=(I−K^−(ξ)) diag⁡(r(ξ)κ1,…,r(ξ)κn) (I−K^+(ξ)),ξ∈ℝ.A(\xi) = \bigl(I - \hat K_-(\xi)\bigr)\, \operatorname{diag}\bigl(r(\xi)^{\kappa_1}, \ldots, r(\xi)^{\kappa_n}\bigr)\, \bigl(I - \hat K_+(\xi)\bigr), \quad \xi \in \R. Here det⁡(I−K^+)\det(I - \hat K_+) has no zeros in the closed upper half-plane and det⁡(I−K^−)\det(I - \hat K_-) has no zeros in the closed lower half-plane.
  2. The integers κ1,…,κn\kappa_1, \ldots, \kappa_n, the partial indices, are uniquely determined by AA, and their sum is the winding number of ξ↦det⁡A(ξ)\xi \mapsto \det A(\xi) about 00.
  3. For 1≤p<∞1 \le p < \infty, the operator φ↦φ(x)−∫0∞K(x−t) φ(t) dt\varphi \mapsto \varphi(x) - \int_0^\infty K(x - t)\, \varphi(t)\, dt on Lp(0,∞)nL^p(0, \infty)^n is invertible if and only if κ1=⋯=κn=0\kappa_1 = \cdots = \kappa_n = 0.

Remarks

The factors themselves are not unique, but the partial indices are. For n=1n = 1 this is the scalar Wiener–Hopf factorization, with the single index κ1\kappa_1 equal to the winding number. The proof cannot take logarithms, because matrices do not commute; one instead reduces to a matrix Riemann–Hilbert problem or works in the algebra of matrix functions with L1L^1 Fourier data.

The total index alone does not decide invertibility. Example: A=diag⁡(r,r−1)A = \operatorname{diag}\bigl(r, r^{-1}\bigr) has det⁡A=1\det A = 1, so the winding number of the determinant is 00. Its partial indices are 11 and −1-1, so the corresponding system of Wiener–Hopf equations is not invertible. The first equation has a range of codimension 11 and the second a kernel of dimension 11. Each entry is admissible, since r(ξ)=1−2iξ+ir(\xi) = 1 - \frac{2i}{\xi + i} and 2iξ+i\frac{2i}{\xi + i} is the Fourier transform of the function equal to 2e−x2e^{-x} for x>0x > 0 and to 00 for x≤0x \le 0. The inverse r−1=1+2iξ−ir^{-1} = 1 + \frac{2i}{\xi - i} is admissible in the same way, with 2iξ−i\frac{2i}{\xi - i} the transform of a function supported on (−∞,0](-\infty, 0].

Going deeper

For a student

The partial indices are the matrix version of the index of a Fredholm operator, but they carry more information than the index. They are unstable: a small perturbation of AA can change them, while their sum stays the same. The same factorization governs the matrix Riemann–Hilbert problem on a closed contour, with the circle in place of the real line. In applications, such as diffraction by a wedge or elasticity with mixed conditions, finding the factors explicitly is the main difficulty, and only special classes of matrices admit closed forms.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 42 pages in order. The foundations come first.

  1. Binary operation definition
  2. Complex numbers object
  3. Element definition
  4. Fourier transform concept
  5. Fredholm index concept
  6. Fredholm operator concept
  7. Function concept
  8. Group concept
  9. Holomorphic function concept
  10. Invertible matrix concept
  11. Proposition concept
  12. Real numbers object
  13. System of linear integral equations concept
  14. Wiener–Hopf equation concept
  15. Commutativity definition
  16. Contour integral definition
  17. Set definition
  18. Laplace transform definition
  19. Implication definition
  20. Predicate definition
  21. Cauchy principal value definition
  22. Winding number definition
  23. Ordered pair definition
  24. Heaviside step function object
  25. Abelian group definition
  26. Existential quantifier definition
  27. Universal quantifier definition
  28. Cartesian product definition
  29. Dirac delta function object
  30. Circle group object
  31. Subset definition
  32. Uniqueness quantifier definition
  33. Binary relation definition
  34. Wiener's lemma statement
  35. Function definition
  36. Wiener–Hopf factorization statement
  37. Metric space definition
  38. Lipschitz map definition
  39. Hölder continuity definition
  40. Sokhotski–Plemelj theorem statement
  41. Riemann–Hilbert problem problem
  42. Matrix Wiener–Hopf factorization statement

Where this leads

1 page builds on this one.

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiener%E2%80%93Hopf_method
About this page
Tag2M672PP7QR
URIm2://2M672PP7QR
Kindstatement, theorem
WritingW0 stub
MSC45F15, 47A68, 47A56
StatusThis copy of the site has no build data. Run m2 status 2M672PP7QR.
AboutSystem of linear integral equations, Wiener–Hopf equation
UsesWiener–Hopf factorization, System of linear integral equations, Fourier transform, Invertible matrix, Winding number, Riemann–Hilbert problem, Wiener–Hopf equation

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

Used by