Math 2.0

Group theory and generalizations Proposition

Cancellation laws

Builds on Group

Statement

Let GG be a group and let a,b,c∈Ga, b, c \in G. If ab=acab = ac, then b=cb = c. If ba=caba = ca, then b=cb = c.

Remarks

The first law is left cancellation and the second law is right cancellation. To prove the first law, multiply ab=acab = ac on the left by a−1a^{-1}. A consequence is that in the Cayley table of a finite group, no element occurs two times in one row or in one column. The laws can fail in a monoid: in (ℤ,⋅)(\mathbb{Z}, \cdot), 0⋅1=0⋅20 \cdot 1 = 0 \cdot 2 but 1≠21 \neq 2.

Going deeper

For a student

The cancellation laws let us remove a common factor from both sides of an equation. The factor must be on the same side in both products.

The proof of left cancellation has three steps:

  1. Suppose that ab=acab = ac.
  2. Multiply both sides on the left by a−1a^{-1}.
  3. Associativity and a−1a=ea^{-1}a = e give b=cb = c.

A worked example in S3S_3, with composition from right to left:

  1. Let a=(1 2)a = (1\,2). Suppose that ax=(1 2 3)ax = (1\,2\,3) and ay=(1 2 3)ay = (1\,2\,3).
  2. Then ax=ayax = ay, so x=yx = y by left cancellation.
  3. Thus x=a−1(1 2 3)=(1 2)(1 2 3)=(2 3)x = a^{-1}(1\,2\,3) = (1\,2)(1\,2\,3) = (2\,3) is the only solution.

This shows a useful consequence. For fixed aa and cc, the equation ax=cax = c has exactly one solution, x=a−1cx = a^{-1}c. Thus each row of the Cayley table of a finite group contains each element exactly one time. The same is true for each column.

A common error is to cancel across sides. From ab=caab = ca we cannot conclude b=cb = c. In S3S_3, let a=(1 2)a = (1\,2), b=(1 3)b = (1\,3) and c=(2 3)c = (2\,3). Then ab=(1 3 2)ab = (1\,3\,2) and ca=(1 3 2)ca = (1\,3\,2), but b≠cb \ne c.

The laws need inverses. In the monoid (ℤ,⋅)(\mathbb{Z}, \cdot), 0⋅1=0⋅20 \cdot 1 = 0 \cdot 2, but 1≠21 \ne 2, because 00 has no inverse.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 6 pages in order. The foundations come first. The path takes the proof Proof of the cancellation laws.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Binary operation definition
  2. Group concept
  3. Identity element definition
  4. Inverse element definition
  5. Proof of the cancellation laws proof
  6. Cancellation laws statement

Where this leads

13 pages build on this one.

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cancellation_property, lead section
About this page
Tag0VSNX4P2Q0
URIm2://0VSNX4P2Q0
Aliasescancellation-law
Kindstatement, proposition
WritingW0 stub
MSC20A05
StatusThis copy of the site has no build data. Run m2 status 0VSNX4P2Q0.
AboutGroup
UsesGroup

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

Used by

Proofs