Math 2.0

Field theory and polynomials Proposition

The only ideals of a field are zero and the whole field

Builds on FieldIdeal

Statement

Let KK be a field and let II be an ideal of KK. Then I={0}I = \{0\} or I=KI = K.

Remarks

The proof: if a∈Ia \in I and a≠0a \neq 0, then 1=a−1a∈I1 = a^{-1} a \in I, so r=r⋅1∈Ir = r \cdot 1 \in I for each r∈Kr \in K. The converse holds: a nonzero commutative ring whose only ideals are {0}\{0\} and the whole ring is a field. For each nonzero aa, the ideal (a)(a) is the whole ring, so 1=ba1 = b a for some bb.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 7 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Group concept
  2. Ring definition
  3. Commutative ring definition
  4. Ideal definition
  5. Unit of a ring definition
  6. Field definition
  7. The only ideals of a field are zero and the whole field statement

Where this leads

24 pages build on this one.

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ideal_(ring_theory), Examples and properties
About this page
Tag0M6G75E95E
URIm2://0M6G75E95E
Kindstatement, proposition
WritingW0 stub
MSC12E99
StatusThis copy of the site has no build data. Run m2 status 0M6G75E95E.
UsesField, Ideal

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

Used by