Math 2.0

Integral equations Fredholm equations and Fredholm theory Theorem

Fredholm's theorem

Builds on Square-integrable kernelFredholm equation of the second kindHomogeneous integral equationAdjoint integral equationCharacteristic value of a kernelFredholm alternativeCompact operatorFredholm operatorSpectral theory of compact operators

Statement

Let a<ba < b and let K∈L2([a,b]×[a,b])K \in L^2([a, b] \times [a, b]) be a square-integrable kernel. Let K∗(x,y)=K(y,x)‾K^*(x, y) = \overline{K(y, x)} be the adjoint kernel, and let μ∈ℂ\mu \in \C. Consider, in L2[a,b]L^2[a, b], the Fredholm equation of the second kind and its adjoint equation φ(x)−μ∫abK(x,y)φ(y) dy=f(x),ψ(x)−μ‾∫abK∗(x,y)ψ(y) dy=g(x).\varphi(x) - \mu \int_a^b K(x, y) \varphi(y) \, dy = f(x), \qquad \psi(x) - \overline{\mu} \int_a^b K^*(x, y) \psi(y) \, dy = g(x). Then:

  1. Either the first equation has exactly one solution φ∈L2[a,b]\varphi \in L^2[a, b] for every f∈L2[a,b]f \in L^2[a, b], or the homogeneous equation with f=0f = 0 has a nonzero solution.
  2. The homogeneous equation (f=0f = 0) and the homogeneous adjoint equation (g=0g = 0) have the same finite number of linearly independent solutions.
  3. Assume the homogeneous equation has a nonzero solution. Then the first equation is solvable if and only if ∫abfψ‾=0\int_a^b f \overline{\psi} = 0 for every solution ψ\psi of the homogeneous adjoint equation.
  4. The set of characteristic values of KK has no accumulation point in ℂ\C. These are the μ\mu for which the homogeneous equation has a nonzero solution.

Remarks

Let TT be the integral operator with kernel KK; it is a compact operator on L2[a,b]L^2[a, b], and its adjoint is the integral operator with kernel K∗K^*. For μ=0\mu = 0 the statements are trivial, and for μ≠0\mu \ne 0 they are statements about I−μTI - \mu T with μT\mu T compact. One proof approximates KK in L2L^2 by a degenerate kernel K0K_0 with ∣μ∣∥K−K0∥<1\abs{\mu} \norm{K - K_0} < 1, with operator T0T_0. Then I−μ(T−T0)I - \mu (T - T_0) is invertible by a Neumann series, and the equation reduces to a finite linear system. The Fredholm alternative for matrices applies to that system.

Example: on [0,1][0, 1] with K(x,y)=xyK(x, y) = xy and μ=3\mu = 3, the homogeneous equation has the solution φ(x)=x\varphi(x) = x, and K∗=KK^* = K. The equation φ(x)−3∫01xyφ(y) dy=f(x)\varphi(x) - 3 \int_0^1 x y \varphi(y) \, dy = f(x) is solvable exactly when ∫01f(x) x dx=0\int_0^1 f(x) \, x \, dx = 0; for instance f=1f = 1 fails this, and indeed integrating φ−3x∫01yφ=1\varphi - 3x \int_0^1 y \varphi = 1 against xx gives the contradiction 0=1/20 = 1/2.

The square-integrability of KK matters because it makes TT compact. For the identity operator on L2[a,b]L^2[a, b], which is bounded but not compact and not given by a square-integrable kernel, the equation φ−φ=0\varphi - \varphi = 0 has infinitely many independent solutions, against part 2.

Going deeper

For a student

These are Fredholm's results, obtained first with his determinants for continuous kernels and later extended to square-integrable kernels. In the language of operators, they say that I−μTI - \mu T is a Fredholm operator of index 00 when TT is compact. They also say that its image is the orthogonal complement of the kernel of its adjoint. Part 4 is the statement that the nonzero spectrum of a compact operator is discrete, as in the spectral theory of compact operators. They are the reason why boundary value problems that reduce to integral equations of the second kind have a solvability theory as clean as linear algebra.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 25 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Adjoint integral equation, concept, no evidence levelAdjoint integral equa…conceptBanach space, concept, no evidence levelBanach spaceconceptCharacteristic value of a kernel, concept, no evidence levelCharacteristic value …conceptCompact operator, concept, no evidence levelCompact operatorconceptEigenvalue, concept, no evidence levelEigenvalueconceptFredholm equation of the second kind, concept, no evidence levelFredholm equation of …conceptFredholm operator, concept, no evidence levelFredholm operatorconceptGroup, concept, no evidence levelGroupconceptHomogeneous integral equation, concept, no evidence levelHomogeneous integral …conceptImage of a linear map, concept, no evidence levelImage of a linear mapconceptKernel of a linear map, concept, no evidence levelKernel of a linear mapconceptLinear equation, definition, no evidence levelLinear equationdefinitionMatrix, definition, no evidence levelMatrixdefinitionSpectrum of an operator, concept, no evidence levelSpectrum of an operat…conceptSquare-integrable kernel, concept, no evidence levelSquare-integrable ker…conceptSpectral theory of compact operators, statement, no evidence levelSpectral theory of co…statementRing, definition, no evidence levelRingdefinitionSystem of linear equations, definition, no evidence levelSystem of linear equa…definitionTranspose, definition, no evidence levelTransposedefinitionCommutative ring, definition, no evidence levelCommutative ringdefinitionUnit of a ring, definition, no evidence levelUnit of a ringdefinitionHomogeneous system of linear equations, definition, no evidence levelHomogeneous system of…definitionField, definition, no evidence levelFielddefinitionFredholm alternative, statement, no evidence levelFredholm alternativestatementFredholm's theorem, statement, no evidence levelFredholm's theoremstatement
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Adjoint integral equation concept
  2. Banach space concept
  3. Characteristic value of a kernel concept
  4. Compact operator concept
  5. Eigenvalue concept
  6. Fredholm equation of the second kind concept
  7. Fredholm operator concept
  8. Group concept
  9. Homogeneous integral equation concept
  10. Image of a linear map concept
  11. Kernel of a linear map concept
  12. Linear equation definition
  13. Matrix definition
  14. Spectrum of an operator concept
  15. Square-integrable kernel concept
  16. Spectral theory of compact operators statement
  17. Ring definition
  18. System of linear equations definition
  19. Transpose definition
  20. Commutative ring definition
  21. Unit of a ring definition
  22. Homogeneous system of linear equations definition
  23. Field definition
  24. Fredholm alternative statement
  25. Fredholm's theorem statement

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fredholm%27s_theorem
About this page
TagXQ8DYKW4SH
URIm2://XQ8DYKW4SH
Kindstatement, theorem
WritingW0 stub
MSC45B05, 47A53
StatusThis copy of the site has no build data. Run m2 status XQ8DYKW4SH.
AboutFredholm equation of the second kind
UsesSquare-integrable kernel, Fredholm equation of the second kind, Homogeneous integral equation, Adjoint integral equation, Characteristic value of a kernel, Fredholm alternative, Compact operator, Fredholm operator, Spectral theory of compact operators
Same as

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.